Obama Needs to Keep New Hampshire Blue
Most people think that New Hampshire doesn’t count much in presidential elections. Think again. Razor-thin margins in small states sometimes control elections. Had Al Gore won the state of New Hampshire in 2000, he would have been elected president.
Michigan, Minnesota, and Pennsylvania are the heavy-hitting so-called blue states most often mentioned as the ones where Barack Obama must apply campaign funds and organizational muscle to defend traditional Democratic turf. True, the loss of any of these heavily populated states will make it difficult for Obama to amass the 270 electoral votes necessary to win the White House.
There is an obvious tendency to think that scarcely populated New Hampshire with four electoral votes won’t have much effect on the final November outcome. But in a very close Electoral College count, tiny New Hampshire could swing the election to one candidate or the other. Had Al Gore won the state of New Hampshire in 2000, he would have been elected president.
New Hampshire holds some special problems for Obama. It is almost entirely white. Unlike many states there is no base of black or Latino voters to help him build a winning coalition of voters. Also, the state has been very good to John McCain. McCain won the New Hampshire GOP presidential primary in both 2000 and 2008. This year a win in New Hampshire jump-started a McCain campaign that many observers had given up for dead. Many New Hampshire voters identify McCain as an independent and a maverick, which fits right into New Hampshire’s view of its own political identity.
Republicans hold a slim 5,000 voter registration edge over Democrats in New Hampshire. But New Hampshirites pride themselves on their independence. There are more voters in New Hampshire who are independents than there are either Republicans or Democrats.
Recent polls show Obama with a very slim lead in New Hampshire. But don’t overlook the so-called Bradley Effect where black candidates in predominantly white areas do better in pre-election polls than they do in the actual election. Remember, too, that Obama had a comfortable lead in pre-primary polls this past January in New Hampshire. But Hillary Clinton revived her campaign with an upset win in New Hampshire. So it is quite possible that due to the Bradley Effect, the small Obama lead currently forecast in the polls in New Hampshire will evaporate on Election Day.
What can Obama do to shore up support in New Hampshire? College students can be a major boost to his chances. There are 15,000 students enrolled at the University of New Hampshire in Durham. About 45 percent of the student body is from out of state, many from Massachusetts. At Dartmouth College in Hanover, there are 6,000 students, most of whom are not New Hampshire residents. Most college students — perhaps two thirds or more — are Obama supporters.
New Hampshire makes it easy for out-of-state college students to register to vote in New Hampshire. The Obama campaign can encourage out-of-state students to register to vote in the swing state of New Hampshire rather than in their home states where Obama may have already sewn up a victory.
In targeting localities in New Hampshire where Obama can find votes, there are large pockets of Democratic-leaning voters in the former mill cities of Manchester and Concord. Democrats hold a 55-45 percent edge in voter registrations in Manchester, the state’s largest city, and they have a similar edge in the state capital of Concord.
In addition, there are large blocs of Democratic voters in cities on the southern border of the state such as Nashua, Portsmouth, Rochester, Durham, and Dover. These cities have grown in recent years due in large part to an influx of residents from nearby Massachusetts, a heavily Democratic state. These southern New Hampshire counties are within commuting distance to Boston. Clinton beat Obama in these counties by considerable margins in the January primary, so Obama has some work to do to win support in these areas.
It would be smart for the Obama campaign to concentrate voter registration and get-out-the-vote efforts in the mill cities, university towns, as well as in the New Hampshire counties on the Massachusetts border.









There is subtle racism in your write up. Why make reference to the so called Bradely effect as if it is established that black candidates do better in pre-poll forecasting than the actual elections? Subtle racism is bbeing played by the media both public and private
African American’s always supported Pres. Clinton, he must realized that he helped Clinton to not be the candidate for President.
I want the Clinton’s to know that out of the millions of American’s that read the garbage about him and Monica, I never read it. I was in constant prayer for the Clinton’s.
President Clinton must return to South Carolina and his statements and disposition, maybe he had an agenda and did not really want Senator Clinton to win.
The Republican Party would have destroyed the Clinton’s and I feel that your daughter have had enough. I didnot want that Monica mess to resurface, I hurt for your wife and your daughter, yet I never turned against the President.
Thinkabout it, maybe this was not for Senator Clinton to be the first women President, maybe it is her daughter and she will deserve it. She cannot be destroyed the way President and Mrs. Clinton could be destroyed. All Afirican American’s will be supportive of her especially the way she conducted herself through that crucial time of what her father did.
I am (65), six years ago I became disabled, recently I have had two TIA’s.
God blessed Senator Obama to win and run for President. Many African-American that can remember the Civil Rights movement. We all recall the “I Have A Dream” speech. Many of us will not live to ever see an African American President. Tthis will not happen again in a hundred years. Yes, his time has come. This was God’s creation, I have covered him with many prayers and the blood of the Lamb the same as I did Pres. Clinton.
It is my prayer that the Clinton’s will unite if not for themselves for the Democratic Party.
Not being united Dems we will lose a lot. The Republican Party will have the opportunity of securing the Supreme Court for the Conservative Party.
Will the Dems destroy the Party because of anger for Senator Obama. He does not lose the entire party lose and I cannot afford (4) more years of Bush. The defict is too high compared to what Pres. Clinton left him with a zero deficit. We have a friend with PTS from Iraq, he will never be the same again.
We all vote Democrat so that the Republican’s will not win.
I know in my heart that Senator Clinton will have a big part to play when the Dems win.
The young lady that did that ad for McCain years from now will regret what she is doing now in 2008.
I want the Democrat Party to make attack Ads against the Republican Party.
An ad of that incident of what happened in Iraq should be played over and over again.
I can say that the twenty-first century belongs to the young people. I am (65) although I am blest that I do not look my age. Senator McCain look much too old to be the president, he have to many Senior moments. He is concentrating so much of what happened to him as a POW it appears to me that his memory is still in that decade/century. This new century is a century of Technology. Senator McCain does not know anything about technology..
DEMOCRATIC’S “LET’S GET IT ON” WE MUST WIN THIS ELECTION FOR FEMALE RIGHTS. for the future generations of Democrats.
GOD BLESS YOU’LL AND GOD BLESS AMERICA, GOD BLESS THE DEMOCRATS TO WIN.
Hilary Clinton must be laughing at her collegues in the Dem party , John Mc Cain did not choose
a running mate the would eve come close to Hilary .Obama made a mistake in his choice
for a running mate,the dream team would have been Obama.Clinton.
I believe Hilary supporters will write in Hilary,Glass ceiling is still in place,and Palin just
fades in comparison to Hilary and the Republicans know it.